Concept of a Bad Bank
The lockdown imposed during the pandemic period, banks are likely to witness an increase in Non-performing assets (NPAs). Before the lockdown, the gross NPAs were below Rs 10 lakh crore, which is now expected to cross Rs 11 lakh crore by the end of this fiscal year.
What are NPAs?
A non performing asset (NPA) is a loan or advance for which the principal or interest payment remained overdue for a period of 90 days. NPAs are further classified as Substandard, Doubtful and Loss assets. Banks use write-offs to remove bad loans from their balance-sheets and minimise their tax liability.
The Finance Minister Mrs Nirmala Sitharaman made a proposal for the ‘bad banks’ in her Budget speech for 2021 for the overall welfare of banks.
It is advocated that ‘Bank Bank should bt incorporated in private sector for because asset restructuring requires quick decision-making, which may not happen in Public Sector Banks.
What is a Bad Bank?
A ‘bad bank’ simply put is a bank that purchases the bad loans of other lenders and financial institutions at market price. Next, the bad bank resolves these bad assets over a period of time. The banks in the process though would be forced to go for write-downs and will be free from the fetters of NPA and can draw a fresh approach toward fresh lending.
A bad bank is technically an asset reconstruction company that buys bad loans(NPAs) from the commercial banks at a discount and tries to recover the money from the defaulter by providing a systematic solution over a period of time.
International Precedent
The 2007-2010 financial crises led to the creation of bad banks in many countries. In the US, as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilisation Act of 2008, a bad bank was suggested to address the subprime mortgage crisis (real estate loans default). In Ireland, the National Asset Management Agency was established in 2009 to respond to the financial crisis.
Issues concerning success of a Bad Bank
- Finding buyers for bad assets in a pandemic hit economy will be a challenge, especially when governments are facing the issue of containing the fiscal deficit.
- Public sector banks have accounted for 86%, of the total NPAs. If appropriate structural reforms in banking sector are not made, they may go on doing business the way they have been doing in the past and may end up piling-up of bad debts again.
- The Government, in the last few years, has infused nearly Rs 2.6 lakh crore in banks through recapitalisation. Those who oppose the concept of bad banks hold that the government has on its part recapitalised the banks to compensate for the write-offs and hence, there is no need for a bad bank.
- The price at which bad assets are transferred from commercial banks to the bad bank will not be market-determined and effect pricing.
- A bad bank may create a moral hazard and enable banks to continue reckless lending practices, without any commitment to reduce NPAs.
Good content
ReplyDelete